Critos Reason to Escape Prison Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Critos Reason to Escape Prison - Assignment Example Crito believes that no one would believe that he actually gave out money for Socrates to escape, but Socrates declined and according to him, there is no any other disgrace than being considered as a person who values money compared to a friend. Crito’s reason for convincing Socrates to escape prison in order to avoid the death penalty is driven by the fact that he cannot believe that Socrates is justified in betraying his own life when he can be saved. Crito asserts that Socrates betraying own life is akin to betraying his own children (Plato, n.d.). This is because he is choosing to leave them when he can bring them up and play a role in educating them. He challenges Socrates by saying that nobody should bring forth children when they are not willing to persevere until the end to educate and nurture them into responsible people. Â  Socrates listens keenly to Crito before giving him reasons that counter his arguments. First and foremost, he tells Crito that he fears that Crito and his other friends may get into trouble with the informers for helping him escape. Additionally, helping him to escape will make them lose their entire or a huge part of their property; or they may even face worse evil. Â  In as much as Crito tries to convince him that they are willing to go to the extreme to ensure that he escapes, Socrates is exceptionally adamant. He gives Crito several premises and asks him whether he is right by saying that opinions of some people are to be valued and opinions others is not to be valued. In saying this, he was telling Crito not to value the opinion of people who will consider him as a person who values wealth as opposed to friendship (Plato, n.d.). According to Socrates, the opinions of such people are the ones to be considered as opinions that do not matter.

Connection between Neoclassical Economics and The Economic Policies of Term Paper

Connection between Neoclassical Economics and The Economic Policies of the President Obama, Psychological Aspect - Term Paper Example This paper is focused on connection of Obama’s proposals and neoclassical economics. A conclusion about Obama’s irrational behavior is made. Consequently, this paper discusses the nature of irrational behavior in economics with regard to current and old behavioral theories in economics. There is also an attempt to continue this kind of research and conduct another study of a broader context. Obama’s Proposals lead to maintaining a neoclassical economic goal: ‘one can improve his/her well-being through increased income to acquire more possessions’ Economic Proposals of Obama concern all social spheres of human life and increase the income of the society in order to reach greater well-being. Public disregard to Obama’s policy and conservatives’ hostile attitude to his politics might be explained by the fact that irrational behavior is less known to the public. Obama’s political course directed on increase of taxes, limitations of small businesses to hire more people; high energetic expenditures through Cap and Trade. FDR and the New Deal were of the main focus for Obama. Further clarifications of Obama’s Proposals may be clarified in accordance with Stigler who claims that economic theories should be considered in accordance with three parameters: congruence with reality, generality, and tractability. Obama’s Proposals partially comply with these parameters. On the one hand, the supporters claim that figures provided by Obama’s government are unrealistic. On the other hand, it is evident that some positive results are reached. Consequently, in the basis of his proposals were realistic assumptions which resulted in realistic predictions. It is possible to consider Obama’s proposals in the paradigm of hedonics theory